Which statement applies to the malware protection flow in Cortex XDR Prevent?

The statement that a trusted signed file is exempt from local static analysis is correct because trusted signed files are generally considered safe and do not require the same level of scrutiny as potentially harmful files. In the context of malware protection, local static analysis serves to identify and evaluate files that may pose a security risk. However, if a file is signed by a trusted source, it is assumed to have passed certain security checks during the signing process, which minimizes the need for further analysis, thus allowing for a more efficient processing flow.

This helps improve performance and allows the system to focus resources on files that may be suspicious. In practical terms, this means the malware protection mechanism can manage threats more effectively by streamlining its analysis processes and reducing unnecessary processing on files that are already verified as safe.